The ever useful Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life has released a new survey . The focus falls on attitudes toward the recent push by the Catholic Bishops to highlight the threats posed to religious liberty.
Results aren’t too surprising. If you’re a Catholic and have heard about the concerns surrounding the HHS contraceptive mandate, you’re more likely to agree with the bishops (56%) than if you’re an atheist (8%). If you go to Mass frequently, you’re more likely to agree (68%) than if you don’t go frequently (49%). If you’re a Catholic who agrees with the bishops that there are threats to religious liberty in current policies, then you’re likely to support Romney (60% to 34% for Obama), and if you don’t you’re in Obama’s camp (78% to 19%).
In sum: if you’re going to church regularly, the bishops’ message resonates. This includes Evangelicals (55% of those who heard of the bishops’ protests agree, while 31% disagree). Meanwhile, if you don’t go to church or are a liberal Protestant—or if you’re inclined to support Obama in any case, you are much less likely to be troubled.
As I said, not surprising. However there are some interesting nuances. First, 41% of Catholics who call themselves Democrats agree with the bishops about threats to religious liberty. That’s a much higher percentage than Democrats more generally (only 28% of all Democrats agree with the bishops). There is a less dramatic but significant margin among Catholic independents (54% agree with the bishops as compared to 40% of all independents). Whether this will move the needle one or two percentage points in the tally in November is an interesting question. This survey suggests that it won’t.
There is another interesting set of results. Concerns about religious liberty have become a partisan issue. Republicans largely agree with the bishops’ protest (62% to 23%), while Democrats are mirror opposites, largely disagreeing (62% to 28%). This fits with a larger trend that I have been following. The Democratic Party is becoming the secular party, while the Republican Party, although less pure, is increasingly the religious party. Douglas Laycock, a prominent liberal defender of religious liberty, has expressed concern about this trend. He worries that as religion become associated with one party, our robust constitutional protections of religious liberty will be threatened. The Left will treat the churches the way the Right has come to treat the universities: as partian institutions to be attacked. That’s a legitimate worry that I also share.
Finally, the survey asks respondents about their views of the leadership of the Catholic Church. Good news here. In 2002, in the wake of the sex scandals, 51% of Catholics said that they were very satisfied or satisfied with the leadership of American bishops. This poll reports that 70% answer in the affirmative today.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…