Science at the DOD

Daniel Sarewitz argues in New Atlantis that science is sick, and that the disease is systemic and terminal. When science is detached from technology, it is loosened from real-world effects. Research exists only for the sake of further research, and science loses the ability to judge whether or not it is making progress. Contemporary science doesn’t observe limits, but intrudes into “trans-science,” attempting to explain phenomena too complex, with too many variables, for controlled examination. Trans-science keeps the research grants coming, though, since every excursion into trans-science inevitably raises more questions than it answers.

Science’s self-destruction, he argues, “can be traced back to a bald-faced but beautiful lie upon which rests the political and cultural power of science. . . . It goes like this: Scientific progress on a broad front results from the free play of free intellects, working on subjects of their own choice, in the manner dictated by their curiosity for exploration of the unknown.”

It is a lie in the old-fashioned sense: It doesn’t fit the facts. As Sarewitz points out, much of the scientific progress of the past century has been achieved not by free intellects pursuing questions of their own choosing. It’s been achieved by the Department of Defense: “DOD’s needs provided not just investments in but also a powerful focus for advances in basic research in fields ranging from high-energy physics to materials science to fluid dynamics to molecular biology.” To take but one specific example: ”In the late 1950s and well into the 1960s, as the role for computers in military affairs was growing but the science wasn’t keeping up, DOD’s Advanced Research Projects Agency essentially created computer science as an academic discipline by funding work at M.I.T., Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, and other institutions.”

One might find DOD involvement in scientific research unsettlingly Strangelovean. One might, more cheerily, think it’s nearly biblical: Dollars devoted to the military complex get diverted to technologies that make possible enough cat videos to last us from now til the end of time.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…