In his history of popular culture in early modern Europe, Peter Burke traces what he describes as the “triumph of Lent” during the 17th and 18th centuries. He refers to Brueghel’s painting, Combat of Carnival and Lent and says, “I am tempted to interpret ‘Carnival,’ who belongs to the tavern side of the picture, as a symbol of traditional popular culture, and ‘Lent,’ who belongs to the church side, as the clergy, who at that time (1559) were trying to reform or suppress many popular festivities.”
Whether the clergy were Protestant and Catholic, one of their aims, or at least results, was a dichotomy of sacred and secular.
After surveying a host of examples of clergy suppressing popular amusements, often associated with festival times, Burke writes, “The crucial point in all these examples seems to be the insistence of the reformers on the separation between the sacred and the profane. This separation now became very much sharper than it had been in the Middle Ages. In other words, the reform of popular culture was more than just another episode in the long war between the godly and the ungodly, it accompanied a major shift in religious mentality or sensibility. The godly were out to destroy the traditional familiarity with the sacred, because they believed that familiarity breeds irreverence.”
Burke is definitely on the side of the “ungodly,” and therefore he paints the clergy’s efforts at reform in a negative way. He doesn’t think it possible that the clergy who tried to reform popular entertainments might have had a point—that the popular entertainments were raunchy or genuinely blasphemous.
At the same time, Burke’s discussion suggests that one of the consequences—intentional or unintentional—was the development of a modern dichotomy of sacred and profane. Medieval popular culture was infused with elements from Christianity—often topsy-turvy and satirical, but dependent nonetheless on the church. On the other hand, elements of popular culture also ended up in the church. The lines were permeable in both directions. With the sixteenth and seventeenth century reforms, religion was increasingly confined into the church, leaving popular entertainments to go their own, secular, way.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…