At the end of 2 Corinthians 6, Paul quotes a series of Old Testament texts in support of his exhortation, “Do not be bound together with unbelievers.” God’s temple has no agreement with idols, and the Christian and the church are temples (v. 16). The church fulfills Yahweh’s promise to dwell and walk among His people (v. 16b; quoting Leviticus 26:12 among other passages). Because the Lord dwells in the church, Christians must “come out from their midst and be separate” and avoiding touching anything unclean (v. 17, quoting Isaiah 52:11).
Verse 18 raises several questions.
First, verse 18 changes the framework; it is not about temples, the Lord’s dwelling, or uncleanness, but about fathers, sons, and daughters. Paul moves from temple language to household/familial terminology. He make the reverse move in Ephesis 2:11-22, moving from talk of strangers, aliens, household to explicit temple and priestly language. These passages together (and there are probably others) suggest that in Paul’s mind household language and temple language are identical or at least parallel. That suggests that the “sonship” language of Paul’s letters has priestly undertones.
Second, verse 18 ends with a “says the Lord Almighty,” but the specific statement of verse 18 is not found anywhere in the Old Testament. The closest the OT comes to this is in 2 Samuel 7 and 1 Chronicles 17:13, both of which record Yahweh’s covenant promises to David. Yahweh explicitly says that He will be father to David’s son, Solomon; but Paul expands that to say that the Lord promises to be a father to every believer, considered as “sons and daughters to Me.”
The Christo-logic of this use of the Davidic covenant is pretty clear: Jesus is David’s Son, the greater Solomon; in Him, all believers are sons and daughters of a heavenly Father, the God of Israel. Given the Davidic covenant echoing in the background, Paul is saying that believers are royal sons and daughters, princes and princesses in Yahweh’s house. And, since that house is a temple, He is saying that we are priests as well as kings, priestesses as well as queens.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
