Not Mugabe

Nelson Mandela and his wife Winnie promoted and even committed violent acts against the Apartheid regime. Earlier this year , I summarized Tom Lodge’s review of Stephen Ellis’s External Mission: The ANC in Exile, 1960-1990 , which maintains that Mandela was part of a small group of Communist ANC leaders who wanted to launch a sabotage campaign. Some of the violence was pretty horrific: Blacks who “collaborated” with the white government were punished by necklacing them, encircling them with gasoline-filled tires and setting them alight. The ANC officially renounced the practice, but Winnie Mandela notoriously said that South Africa would be liberated with “boxes of matches” and “necklaces.”

The ANC used the same toolbox of terror that Mugabe had in Rhodesia, but that only sharpens the point: South Africa is no Zimbabwe. Given his past,Mandela’s conduct in power is something of a miracle. Max Boot writes ,

“I can remember growing up in the 1980s when there was widespread suspicion among conservatives in the U.S.including many in the Reagan administrationthat if the African National Congress were to take over, South Africa would be transformed into another dysfunctional dictatorship like the rest of the continent. That this did not come to pass was due to many reasons including F.W. de Klerks wisdom in giving up power without a fight.

“But the largest part of the explanation for why South Africa is light years ahead of most African nationswhy, for all its struggles with high unemployment, crime, corruption, and other woes, it is freer and more prosperous than most of its neighborsis the character of Nelson Mandela. Had he turned out to be another Mugabe, there is every likelihood that South Africa would now be on the same road to ruin as Zimbabwe. But that did not happen because Mandela turned out to be, quite simply, a great mansomeone who could spend 27 years in jail and emerge with no evident bitterness to make a deal with his jailers that allowed them to give up power peacefully and to avoid persecution.”

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…