More notes, taken from or inspired by Michael Dahood’s Anchor Bible commentary.
1) Dahood makes good sense of the entire Psalm by assuming that it moves from a place of battle and victory (vv. 5-14), to the victory celebration in the tents of the war camp (vv. 15-18), and then the army returns to the city (v. 19) and the temple (vv. 26-27). This also makes sense of the connection of this Psalm with Palm Sunday: Jesus has been in confinement, surrounded by enemies, but His Father has delivered Him and brought Him to Jerusalem, where the crowds greet Him in a triumphal procession.
2) Dahood notes the contrast between the “confinement” in which the Psalmist finds himself, and the “large place” to which he is brought (or from which Yahweh answers). He’s given room to maneuver.
3) Dahood also notes the pun on “fear” (YARE) and “see” (R’AH) in verses 6-7. The Psalmist does not fear, because he is confident that he will “look on” (Dahood: “gloat over”) his enemies.
4) Dahood takes “cut off” as a reference to circumcision, and cites 1 Samuel 18:25-27. He suggests that the Psalm has specific reference to David’s conflicts with the Philistines, who were one of the few nations surrounding Israel that did not practice circumcision.
5) The second person address in verse 13 is odd. Dahood suggests that it is the Psalmist’s address to Death, who pushes him so that he begins to fall into the confinement of the grave, where he cannot praise Yahweh. Yahweh rescues him, so that he can record the words of Yahweh.
6) Dahood interprets verse 24 as “This is the day Yahweh has acted.” It is the day of the Yahweh, the day of Yahweh’s appearance and triumph.
7) Verse 27a is not, Dahood argues, a sentence (Yahweh is God) but the composite name of Yahweh: El Yahweh. The WAW attached to the following verb (“he has shone”) is not conjunctive. Hence, he translates: “El Yahweh has truly shone upon us,” that is, in giving victory over enemies.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
