Solomon clearly considers his execution of Joab to be an act of justice: Yahweh is bringing the blood that Joab shed back on his own head. And Solomon also indicates that the execution of Joab is necessary to clear David’s house of blood-guilt. This is suggested in two ways.
First, David uses unusual language to describe Joab’s actions in 1 Ki 2:5. Joab, David says, is guilty because he ?shed the blood of war in peace?E(v. 5). The phrase ?shed blood?Eusing the verb SIM (normally translated as ?set?Eor ?place?E is almost unique in the Hebrew Bible; normally blood is ?poured out?E(Heb. SHAPHAK). The only other use of the idiom found in 1 Kings 2:5 is in Deuteronomy 22:8, which warns that accidents that result from negligence will ?bring bloodguilt upon the house.?E Thus, Joab’s murders have brought bloodguilt on the “house” of David, his dynasty (Joab is considered a member of the house), and this can be removed only by the execution of the one who caused the bloodguilt to fall.
Second, Solomon’s speech in 1 Kings 2:31-33 is arranged chiastically, in such a way to make it clear that the execution of Joab removes blood guilt from David’s house and thereby established the kingdom of Solomon.
A. Fall upon him and bury him to remove blood from me and my father?s house
B. Yahweh returns blood on him
C. Because he killed two better and more righteous men
D. David was ignorant
C’. Abner and Amasa
B’. Blood will be on Joab and seed
A’. But to David and seed peace of Yahweh forever
We can read this, as Breck suggests, in a circular way, moving from A to A to B to B and so on. On this reading, the text says: Remove blood from me and my fathers house, and bring peace (A and A’); for Yahweh returns blood on Joab, even on his seed forever (B and B’); because he killed two better men, even Abner and Amasa (C and C’); but David was innocent (D). We can read from inside out as well: The assertion in D serves as a justification for the cleansing of the house, which is described in A and A’; because David was ignorant of Joab’s plans and actions, his house can be freed of blood guilt by the “sacrifice” of Joab.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
