In a 2006 article in the Westminster Theological Journal , William Wilder offers a sharp interpretation of the significance of the “tree of knowledge of good and evil” and the clothing of Adam and Eve with animal skins in Genesis 3.
He makes the striking point that “the most important clues to the significance of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil come from the mouth of the serpent,” since he links the tree to wisdom, opened eyes, God-likeness. He explores the use of the phrase elsewhere in the Old Testament, and concludes that the tree is a “tree of wisdom,” that would enable Adam and Eve to “attain the kind of savoir-faire which the rest of the OT associates with adults and kings and which she simply (and simplistically) associated with God. Eve understood enough of the serpent’s predictions to see in the tree a promise of wisdom which would make her and Adam like God.” Knowledge of good and evil was not wrong, but rather the fulfillment of Adam and Eve as images of God, “God’s vice regents over the earth.”
The eventual investiture of Adam and Eve fits neatly in this context.
In the Ancient Near East and Bible, investiture was understood into “more complete likeness to God” and elevation to a position of rule. Wilder thinks that “the reason for mentioning Adam and Eve’s nakedness at the end of Gen 2 is to arouse in the reader an expectation of royal investiture in keeping with man’s Gen 1 status as the ruling ‘image of God’ on earth.”
What they get is a “sad caricature” of investiture. Immediately after they eat they clothe themselves in leaves. Their eyes are opened, and they are clothed in garments, but instead of resembling God they “resemble instead a tree or a bush. Having idolized themselves, they now resemble the wood from which such idols are carved.” God doesn’t leave things there, though. He elevates them by giving animal skins for their plant garment, and He graciously sends them from the garden with ‘some token of their proper inheritance.” Genesis puns on the Hebrew word for “light” ( ‘or ) and the word for “skin” ( ‘or ): The pun evokes “the alternative image of light,” and points to an eventual glorification in robes of light.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
