Paul Veyne ( When Our World Became Christian ) notes the radical difference between paganism and Christianity (which is calls a “masterpiece” and compares to a “best-seller” that revealed a “thitherto unsuspected sensibility”):
“Augustus, following his victory over Antony and Cleopatra at Actium, had, as we know, settled his debt to Apollo by consecrating a sanctuary and a local cult to the god. The Christogram that appeared on the shields of Constantine’s army indicated that victory had been won thanks to the god of the Christians. However, what was not understood was that the relationship between this god and his creatures was a permanent, passionate and mutual one, whereas the relationship between the human race and the race of pagan gods, who were primarily concerned about themselves was, so to speak, international, contracted and spasmodic. Apollo had not instigated his relationship with Augustus and had never instructed the latter to sweep to victory under his divine sign.”
In short, “a pagan was content with his gods if he had elicited their help by means of his prayers and vows; a Christian instead endeavoured to make his God content with him. Augustus did not serve Apollo; he simply turned to him for help.” By contrast, “Constantine repeatedly declared that he was simply the servant of Christ, who had admitted him to his service and would always procure him victory.”
As evidence of the “contracted and spasmodic” relationships between pagan gods and their followers, Veyne gives two examples: “at the death of a much loved prince, Germanicus, the Roman plebs stoned the temples and toppled their altars, just as today’s demonstrators might attack a foreign embassy; in Late Antiquity, Emperor Julian, a man who harked back to the past, indignant at having suffered a military defeat, refused to sacrifice to Mars ever again.”
Two notes, one theological and one historical. The historical first: If many pagans didn’t grasp the character of this new religion, Constantine evidently did. As Veyne says, his declarations are replete with the recognition that Christ is Lord and Constantine his servant. The theological point is to highlight the radical novelty of the biblical emphasis on God’s sovereign Godness, manifested in His free election. Pagans chose what gods they willed; in Scripture, God chooses whom He wills. Neglecting, marginalizing, or softening the biblical doctrine of election blunts the edge that made Christianity a “best-seller” in the first place.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…