George Steiner

James Gardner captures the eccentricity, flaws, and brilliance of George Steiner in a short piece in the June 15 issue of the Weekly Standard .

His weaknesses are manifest – Steiner is “an unapologetic know-it-all and acrobatic show-off” given to “incessant posturings in print.” Gardner describes his usual modus as one of “hyperventilating conviction, elevated, intellectualized, and incessant.” I would only add that writing like a know-it-all is easier when you know as much as Steiner does. He makes an illuminating comparison of Steiner and de Maistre, but notes that Steiner wears his pessimism so lightly and so long that he has become “so comfortable in his lugubrious dissent as to be oddly heartened by it.”

But he also notes that Steiner recognizes that the “defining, immovable truth of modern times is the rise of totalitarianism in Germany and Russia . . . and the West’s dysthmic response to it.” Steiner’s “abiding reverence for words” and his “rare sense of style” give him an ability to “summon the syntactical powers of English” beyond his contemporaries.

Above all, he commends Steiner’s selection of the writers that mean most to him: “It is here that Steiner’s [tragic] reverence for the exile, the displaced person, the ‘depayse,’ reaches its fullest fruition. Most people who take letters seriously view their native literature with a parochial, even tribalistic sense of proprietorship, just as they regard foreign literature as – foreign.” Not Steiner: Since he is “nowhere a native, it follows that he is foreign to no culture, at least no European culture.”

Gardner also observes that Steiner is almost along among contemporary critics in being “spectacularly ambitious.” For Steiner, “everything is always at stake in all of his writings, as though history and the future of mankind itself hang in the balance . . . . You have only to read a few salvos of his prose to understand just how spare are the aspirations of most of his latter-day colleagues of the scribal class, just how little faith they have in the power of words to do anything more than meet a deadline.”

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…