Interacting with NT Wright’s book on resurrection, Dominic Crossan says that what’s important for him is not whether the claims of the resurrection are literal or metaphorical. Either way, the claims forced a clash with imperial Rome, and that’s what really matters. He wants to say that we should read the imperial claims about Augustus’s divine sonship and Christian claims about Jesus’ in the same way ?Eeither both are meant literally or both metaphorically. Yet, whichever we choose, we still have a clash. He also suggested that ancient peoples didn’t think in “post-Enlightenment” terms that distinguish metaphorical from literal.
A couple of observations on this: First, as Jim Jordan noted after the talk, the bodily resurrection is in fact necessary to support Crossan’s anti-imperial version of Christianity. If we are only talking about Jesus’ “spirit” or some diffused power, then that can always be “coopted” by political powers. Caesar can always say that the “genius” of Jesus is upon him. If Jesus is a risen Person, however, He really can confront Lord Caesar.
Second, liberalism of Crossan’s variety appears to be more concrete and this-worldly than earlier varieties of liberalism. That’s true, but it’s important to see that it’s still liberalism in the most fundamental sense. According to Lindbeck’s schema, liberalism has an “expressive-experiential” view of doctrine. Doctrine is a way of symbolizing religious experience. Myths and symbols tell visually and imaginatively about my experience with God. Crossan believes the same thing, except that what doctrine/biblical narrative symbolizes is not individual experience but community experience and community norms. This does make the system more concrete and this-worldly, because the actual historical community is what is being articulated in the symbols and stories. But it is still basically liberal. Crossan’s is a communitarian liberalism.
Third, Crossan’s viewpoint is fundamentally Pelagian. The preaching of the resurrection is a warning and an exhortation about how humans should live in the world. It tells us to live justly. But it is NOT God’s action that establishes justice. It’s left to us.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…