Paul Nickell’s 1951 Westinghouse Studio One production of Coriolanus is fast-paced, well-acted, and, making allowances for technological weaknesses, interesting and fun to watch. It is also very unlike the play that Shakespeare wrote. The play begins with plebs rioting (or milling around) in the streets of Rome, complaining about the price of grain, patrician greed, and their condition of life in Rome. Martius comes on the scene with the words “What’s the matter, you dissentious rogues,” and after that he gets rude. There can be no doubt why the plebs detest the military hero of Rome as they do.
Nickell begins with the events of Act 1, scene 4, where Coriolanus fights single-handedly to take the Volscian city of Corioles. He excoriates the soldiers fighting under him, but in the context of battle the rhetoric is appropriate. When he is honored by Cominius, he humbly refuses a 10% share of the spoil, and is embarrassed by all the fuss about his heroics. When Coriolanus seeks the plebs’ voice to make him consul, his doubts about the whole procedure are not spoken out loud to the plebs (as they are in the play) but in a voice-over.
All of Nickell’s script is in the play, but by beginning the film as he does, Nickell made it difficult to discern any reason for the tribunes’ hostility to Coriolanus, and their accusation that he is proud seems absurd. Coriolanus is simply the misunderstood and unappreciated war hero, manipulated by ungrateful, shameless, and power-hungry demagogues. This is a possible interpretation of the life of Coriolanus, but it works as an interpretation of Shakespeare’s play only if the play is abridged and rearranged.
No doubt, the fact that the film was produced in 1951 goes some way to explaining the way it is constructed. Still in the glow of the military victory in WWII, Americans would probably not be very sympathetic to a leftish interpretation of the play that acutely probed the uses of military valor.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…