Luther Peterson writes, “The confessionalization thesis is a fruitful instrument in explaining the transformation of medieval feudal monarchies into modern states, in particular how the new states changed their inhabitants into disciplined, obedience and united subjects. According to the thesis, a key factor in that change is the establishment of religious uniformity in the state: the populate was taught a religious identity – Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinist – through doctrinal statements (confessions and catechisms) and liturgical practices. This distinguished ‘us’ as a religious and political community from ‘other,’ often neighboring, religious-political societies. The rule was sacralized as the defending and – in Protestant lands – leader of the church, rightfully overseeing the church of his land. These state-led churches also aided state development by imposing moral discipline on the communities.”
R. Po-Chia Hsia agrees:
“The process of political centralization, discernible in the fifteenth century – the adoption of Roman Law, the rise of an academic jurist class, the growth of bureaucracies, and the reduction of local, particularist privileges – received a tremendous boost after 1550. Conformity required coercion. Church and state formed an inextricable matrix of power for enforcing discipline and confessionalism. The history of confessionalization in early modern Germany is, in many ways,the history of the territorial state.” Confessionalization was largely sponsored by the state, which “usually played a more crucial role than the clergy in determining the course of confessionalization . . . . Having become the head of their territorial churches, princes understood the imposition of confessional conformity both as an extension of their secular authority and as the implementation of God’s work.”
Necessarily, this enforcement of uniform confession meant that “local and particular privileges had to be swept aside; estates, towns, cloisters, and nobility resisted confessionalization behind the bulwark of corporate privileges.” The resistance worked for a longer while than we think. Even in 1624, in the region around Osnabruck, most of the clergy could not be easily categorized as Lutheran or Catholic.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…