Michael Hanby (No God, No Science? 31) makes the arresting claim that “the equation of abstraction with the movement from particular to general” is “not ontologically innocent.” It instead “reflects the deep-seated mechanistic assumption that the ‘parts’ of reality are ontologically prior to the whole of it, with the latter being merely the aggregation of the former and the result of their history of interaction.”
This is not how the world is: “in the actual world, the existence of each thing is characterized by a near infinity of relations which help to constitute it.”
When we start from this concrete existential condition, then abstract is what it was for Aristotle and Thomas: Not a move from particular to general, but an isolation “in thought” of what “actually belongs together in reality: form and matter, parts and wholes, a thing and the context which is the presupposition of its flourishing.” On this view, experimentation is an effort to dissociate what is normally associated, and thus a form of abstraction.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
