The Petraeus Affair and the End of the Clinton Era

Gen. David Petraeus has resigned his post as Director of the CIA. He explains his reasons in a letter :

Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position as D/CIA. After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours. This afternoon, the President graciously accepted my resignation.

People immediately asked : “Do you really have to resign over an extramarital affair?” The question is a fair one: If a man is fulfilling all his professional duties fully, does a personal issue like this matter?

However obscured the answer is in any other areas of life, the particular pressures of the intelligence world bring into focus a universal truth: Every compromise, personal or professional, affects the whole man. A private affair calls into question an intelligence officer’s judgment and, if kept secret, opens him to blackmail or other sorts of pressure, thus endangering his security clearance.

Petraeus knew all this, of course, and still acted in a way he clearly feels to have been wrong. While it may not have been strictly necessary for Petraeus to resign (I’m sure we’ll learn more about this from the lawyers and others who regularly handle such cases), his case nonetheless brings into focus the necessary connection between the personal and professional.

The Petraeus affair can be taken, then, as yet another sign that the Clinton era is over. Clinton’s successful battle against impeachment succeeded on technicalities but at the basic level asserted that the personal really could be disentangled from the professional, that a peccadillo never could rise to the level of a firing offense.

We’ve been digesting this claim ever since. Shows like  Breaking Bad  and The Sopranos achieved immense critical success while offering extended meditations on—-and rejections of—-this idea. General Petraeus’ resignation offers a more concise, and very unfortunate, lesson on the same subject. Nor should it go unnoted that America just reelected a man who, whatever one makes of his politics, to all appearances acts with immense personal integrity.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…