What Is Protestantism?

Alec Ryrie portrays what it meant to be an early Protestant in his Being Protestant in Reformation Britain.

As the TLS reviewer points out, this is no longer a fashionable question: “Historians of the early Reformation now prefer to use the term ‘evangelicals,’ in recognition of the fact that the early reformers did not think of themselves as Protestants and often angrily rejected the term when it was applied to them. Nor does the concept of Protestantism add much to our understanding of the doctrinal disputes that divided Lutherans, Calvinists and Anabaptists as much from each other as from the common Catholic enemy.”

Ryrie’s definition of Protestantism is not doctrinal or liturgical, but rather is a form of Christianity characterized by earnestness and, to use their own terms, zeal: “Protestantism, he suggests, was ‘intense, dynamic, restless, progressive.’ It took religion very seriously; it craved authenticity and dreaded hypocrisy; it was marked by a ‘sense of endless struggle’, ‘unceasing selfdiscipline’ and a ‘pervasive intellectual tendency to anatomize and subdivide.’ Above all, it believed in the importance of being earnest.”

Ryrie doesn’t think the caricature of gloomy Calvinism is fair: “He acknowledges that Protestantism could be cruelly demanding, even ‘frankly pathological,’ in the burdens it imposed on its adherents. Yet it could also be deeply passionate in its expressions of ‘rapture,’ ‘ravishment’ and ecstatic union with God. ‘This silent yet lovely language of ardent and fervent desires,’ as one Scottish preacher described it (for some reason the Scots seem to have been particularly susceptible to this type of language), calls to mind not so much the classic Protestant aesthetic of whitewashed church interiors, as the baroque eroticism of St Teresa of Avila and St John of the Cross.”

The review suggests that Ryrie is really describing Puritanism rather than Protestantism in general, but concludes that “No book has ever brought early modern Protestantism to life so vividly, so eloquently and so movingly.”

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…