What Art Is

Modernism, Arthur Danto argues in What Art Is posed a fundamental challenge not only to artistic styles but to the very conception of art. As Ian Ground explains in his TLS review of Danto’s book, Danto believed that art as capable of definition even if we have lost the ability to make things that meet that definition: “If art in our culture has come to an end, as Danto once believed, there must at least have been something that it was. Danto’s famous argument from the indiscernibility of identical counterparts begins with the arresting premiss that a pair of objects (say, a painting by Jackson Pollock and the aftermath of a mishap in a paint factory) may be perceptually indistinguishable, and yet one but not the other is a work of art.”

What makes the painting different from the art work is not substance or empirical properties: “Works of art must have properties that are inherently contextual or relational. If this argument is sound, it is natural to expect that the concept of art does have a core, and is capable of definition. Of course, no particular aesthetic or moral or religious content will be part of such a definition: the content of artworks will vary contingently across time and cultures. What then is the core of the concept of art? Danto’s answer was that a something is a work of art if (and only if) it has just such relational and contextual properties: the artwork embodies meaning in the material form of the object. Very often that meaning will be substantial, multi-layered and endlessly interpretable. But, at the limit, an object may come to embody meaning, simply by virtue of being exhibited as an artwork, say, in a gallery.”Art, in Danto’s view, is a concept whose meaning is constructed through a set of institutions that enable it to embody a meaning.

There’s a great deal of virtue in this definition; in fact, it may be the only reasonable non-theological definition of art. But it’s not ultimately satisfying, precisely because it leaves out what is central in theological definitions – human beings, made in the image of an infinitely creative Creator, a God who is not only Father but also eternal Image/Ars and the Breath of eternal Music.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…