Tucker Max, the bestselling author and self-proclaimed “frat-boy David Sedaris,” makes me glad that adolescent boorishness usually goes along with illiteracy. His stories—-centered on the abuse of alcohol and of women, in both cases extreme—-are generally better to ignore than deplore
One of Max’s favorite games is to act aggrieved and misunderstood by people who refuse to recognize his supposedly deep feminism, a practice he’s taken to new lengths after several Planned Parenthood clinics declined to be renamed in his honor in exchange for a $500,000 donation. He blasts them on his blog (highlighting in the original):
If you think Tucker Max hates women, how to do you explain him giving 500k to PP? Well, they said this made me . . . MORE anti-woman? HAHAHA! . . . So to these people, cutting a 500K check to help women out is ANTI-WOMAN!! Politicians cutting money to PP is anti-woman, and now, so is me giving money to PP. I guess regardless of what I do, I’m against women. That is kind of awesome when you can make someone so angry, they can’t even be ideologically consistent in their criticism of you.
Well, Tucker, I would be happy to offer you a philosophically consistent criticism. Sleeping with a woman in a situation grossly blurred by alcohol and outside the bounds of marriage—-a situation in which consent, the only moral criterion you recognize, is impossible—-indeed is “anti-woman,” not to mention vicious in the extreme. To subsequently pay for the woman’s abortion, as you have boasted of doing in several instances, is only to commit another act of violence, both on the woman and on your unborn child.
Having said that, I sympathize with Planned Parenthood’s reluctance to be associated with Max. His egregious treatment of women falls short of even their relatively flimsy notions of “reproductive health” and “women’s choice.” Yet it’s the very weakness of those ideas—-their refusal to recognize a purpose for human sexuality beyond recreation—-that opens up cultural space for his particularly irresponsible brand of misogyny.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
