At least Thiselton gets James Barr right. Asked about the meaning of ekklesia in the New Testament, “we might say (a) ‘the Church is the Body of Christ’ (b) ‘the Church is the first installment of the Kingdom of God’ (c) ‘the Church is the Bride of Christ, and other such statements. In one sense Barr concedes, this is the ‘meaning of “church.”’ But it is certainly not ‘the meaning of ‘church’ in Matt. 16.18 .”
Exactly: Totality transfer is a fallacy about word usage, not about concepts. Barr agrees that one can properly compile all the uses of a term, and related terms, in the Bible, and come up with the total biblical concept. The error comes when we assume that that total concept is the meaning of the word in every context where it is used.
Grow the concept as big as you please, Barr says; just don’t try to stuff it into the small space occupied by the word in a particular passage.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
