Twice in the opening question of the Summa , Thomas justifies some institution or practice in the church with a reference to the need for saving truth to be communicated to the uneducated many.
Are sacred doctrine, and revelation, necessary? Yes, and partly because “the truth of God such as reason could discover would be known by a few,” an elite with the leisure and training to pursue philosophical contemplation.
Should Scripture use metaphors? Yes, Thomas answers, and partly so that “even the simple who are unable by themselves to grasp intellectual things may be able to understand it.”
Two reflections: First, this ain’t Aristotelian. Second, Thomas, an advocate for the plebs!
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Letters
Joshua T. Katz’s (“Pure Episcopalianism,” May 2025) reason for a theologically conservative person joining a theologically liberal…
The Revival of Patristics
On May 25, 1990, the renowned patristics scholar Charles Kannengiesser, S.J., delivered a lecture at the annual…
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
