The Meaning of Monsters

In an essay in the Times Literary Supplement , Marina Warner reviews Wes Williams ’ new book “Monsters and Their Meanings in Early Modern Culture.” The thesis of the book might surprise some, in that it asserts that monsters do not represent a static fear, but actually arise in times of conflict and uncertainty as a way of staving off complete panic. They “serve to unfold a fluctuating history of values and emotions as well as of changing aesthetics, philosophy, medical science, and the proper uses of curiosity.”

There are, of course, numerous sources for the phenomenon of monsters, as Williams notes: the ever-fertile imaginations of children, a culture’s political scene, with its heroes and villains, and, of course, the simple, eternal human encounter with the unfamiliar, which will always tend to imagine enemies when difference is encountered. Additionally, non-divine “gigantic figures” have made an appearance in the religious literature of just about every civilization, including the Bible (the mention of the Nephilim in Genesis, for instance).

Nevertheless, as Williams’ book points out, the vast majority of our popular interactions with these creatures, from Halloween costumes to the box-office success of wizard and vampire films, “can be allegorized along sixteenth century lines.” In this sense, “monsters” and “magic”—a literary device which arguably reached the height of its influence in Shakespeare, not earlier or later—are actually phenomena of the modern age, not the vestiges of a tribal or sacral culture. As we atomize and taxonimize the world, these beasts terrify precisely because they represent our quiet intuition about the whole project: that it ultimately fails on its own terms (there will always be some things it cannot explain), and that, if the project of disenchantment is taken to its extreme, it offers neither intelligibility nor grace to the world, but leaves us to fend for ourselves against dark forces we can no longer name, but still must acknowledge for the sake of our sanity.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…