1. Pete and Olson’s thought about the Santorum strategy being two decades too late with his economic/manufacturing focus is what I thought when he announced for the nomination. A rich guy asked me if he should give significant bucks to Rick’s campaign, and I said he won’t last past Iowa.
2. The reason he has, Ross Douthat is right to say, is that he’s the candidate the Republicans have who’s both most authentic and most substantial. It probably isn’t the right substance for victory this year. But still . . .
3. Of all the antiestablishment candidates who might have enduringly overachieved (beginning with Bachmann), he’s the one who actually did.
4. The religion/conscience issue that helps Santorum now in Republican primaries and especially caucuses would probably do him in in November. It’s the opinion of both establishment Republicans and Democrats that he wouldn’t have much of a chance to even come close to whipping the president. It is possible, of course, that they’re wrong. But for now Rick has fewer endorsements than even Newt. It’s worth noting that Romney is in no position to exploit Rick’s weakness of this front. One more thing: Remember that the MSM has decided, for now, to lay off Rick as the “religious bigot.” That delayed “vetting” could commence at any moment.
5. If Santorum wins in Michigan (and especially if he goes on to win in Ohio), John P. is perfectly right to say that only God knows what would happen next.
6. Some say it helps Romney that Gingrich and Santorum both stay in the race as long as possible. The opposite is true under the proportional representation regime. If both guys remain “viable,” then Romney will consistently come up well short of winning a majority of the delegates. That means, of course, that Newt and Rick should lay off each other and fire together at Romney from different positions. It’s above my pay grade to advise Mitt on how to fight that two front war.
7. If either Gingrich or Santorum drop out, studies show about half of the candidate’s support goes to Romney.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
