Perhaps we should not call it “intertextuality,” but something like intertextuality is necessary to textual meaning, even at the most basic levels. You cannot read a single sentence without bringing some knowledge of the language to bear on the text. The reader must have information from outside the text if he is going to understand anything. A text (or, better, a text’s author) can mean only as a piece of discourse in a world of discourses.
Move a notch from literal meaning, and the point becomes even more dramatically obvious. Understanding a simile like “the wicked are like chaff” requires not only competence in English but something more. A reader must not only know the literal meaning of “chaff,” but must also know that chaff is light, chaff is waste, chaff is easily blown by the wind, chaff is useless, chaff is . . . . None of this is directly given in the text – and yet it is essential to the text.
Another example: “He’s another Churchill” requires not only competence in English language, but some knowledge of modern English history. Again, information that the text does not provide is absolutely necessary for making sense of the text.
All this to say that textual boundaries, however physically fixed by margins, white spaces, and book covers, are hermeneutically porous.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…