Structure of Song of Songs

Gordon Johnston’s aforementioned article reviews and evaluates a number of structural analyses of the Song.  He doesn’t find any of the following persuasive, but they provide some helpful pointers to the shape of the Song.

The Targum and many Jewish commentators see the Song as an allegorical poem about Israel’s history, a view that Johnston helpfully summarizes:

1. Prologue: Opening Praise (1:2–4)

2. Exodus, Sinai, Conquest (1:5–3:6)

3. Early Monarchy and Building of the Temple (3:7–5:1)

4. Israel’s Apostasy, Babylonian Exile, Repentance (5:2–6:1)

5. Second Temple Period up to the Diaspora (6:2–7:14)

6. Eschatological Events and Messianic Kingdom (8:1–10)

7. Epilogue: Concluding Prayer (8:11–14)

1. Prologue: Opening Praise (1:2–4)

2. Exodus, Sinai, Conquest (1:5–3:6)

3. Early Monarchy and Building of the Temple (3:7–5:1)

4. Israel’s Apostasy, Babylonian Exile, Repentance (5:2–6:1)

5. Second Temple Period up to the Diaspora (6:2–7:14)

6. Eschatological Events and Messianic Kingdom (8:1–10)

7. Epilogue: Concluding Prayer (8:11–14)

In a 1980 article, William Shea argued for a chiastic outline that Johnston gives in this form:

A. Six alternating speeches, brothers and vineyards of the beloved

(1:2–2:2)

B. Apple motif, double refrain, approach, mother’s house, possession

(2:3–17)

C. Dream, groom’s praise, bride’s beauty, invitation (3:1–

4:16)

C.’ Dream, groom’s praise, bride’s beauty, response (5:1–

7:11)

B.’ Apple motif, double refrain, approach, mother’s house, possession

(7:12–8:5)

A.’ Six (?) alternating speeches, brothers and vineyards of the beloved

(8:6–14)

In an early article, Cheryl Exum found a modified chiastic structure:

A. Vineyard and brothers, desire for intimacy (1:2–2:6)

B. Call to the woman + seeking and finding (2:7–3:5)

C. Question (“who is this?”) + a description of the woman

(3:6–5:1)

B.’ Call to the woman + seeking and finding (5:2–6:3)

C.’ Description of the woman + a question (“who is this?”)

(6:4–8:3)

A.’ Vineyard and brothers, desire for intimacy (8:4–14)

And Richard Davidson offered another modified chiasm, a chiastic inclusio surrounding a parallel structure:

A. Mutual love (1:2–2:7)

B. Coming and going (2:8–17)

C. Dream I: lost and found (3:1–5)

D. Praise of groom I (3:6–11)

E. Praise of bride I (4:1–7)

F. Praise of bride II (4:8–15)

G. Invitation by bride (4:16)

G.’ Acceptance of invitation by groom (5:1)

C. Dream II: found and lost (5:2–8)

D.’ Praise of groom II (5:9–6:3)

E.’ Praise of bride III (6:4–12)

F.’ Praise of bride IV (7:1–10)

B.’ Going and coming (7:11–8:2)

A.’ Mutual love (8:3–14)

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…