Savage Miracles

Carlin Barton closes a brilliant article comparing concepts of honor, sacrifice, and sacramentum found among martyrs and gladiators with some observations on the wider cultural import of her work. One of her main aims is to overcome the perception that Christians and Romans were working in completely separate symbolic universes, a perception that fundamentally shapes the historical work of Gibbon and Nietzsche’s genealogy:

“For Edward Gibbon, like Friedrich Nietzsche, the Romans were the strong and the noble. Both saw a sanguine, virile, joyfully predatory Rome attacked and infested by a mode of being foreign and alien to the Roman spirit that subverted the valuation of the proud and noble with the positive valuation of the humble and base . . . .

“Caesar and Christ are, for us, the archetypical heroes of two antithetical cosmologies. We might, like Nietzsche and Gibbon before him, marvel or lament at the subversion of the victor by the victim, the masters by the martyrs, a mightly and worldly Rome mysteriously undermined by, or radically converted to, a view of the universal fundamentally at odds with that inhabited by the conquerors of Corinth and Carthage. If so, we fail to see the degree to which the proud Roman animus was already turned against itself, nor how deeply in love with victory and glory was the humble Christian.”

Classicists gravitate to Scipio and Caesar, Cicero and Virgil, but “in the late Republic and early Empire, the most popular heroes and heroines represented in their persons and responded to what seem to us far less sanguine and sober strains in the Roman psyche. Lucretia, Mucius, Regulus, Decius, and the gladiator were only the most conspicuous of the humiliated and defeated heroes who attempted to wring glory from their own bowels.” What Barson wants to stress is that these are precisely the Roman heroes that Christians (like Augustine) pointed to as precursors to Christian martyrdom. Caesar and Virgil join Christ only in the Renaissance, with Dante; but “other Romans were there from the beginning.”

In short, many Romans identified with the position of Christians, “defeated and humiliated – without necessarily finding salvation in the burning flesh of a mucius or a Peregrinus or a Laurence, without recognizing the criminal crucified on the cross as their redeemer . . . . For many Romans there was simply no redemption.”

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…