Kumar suggests that there is no useful distinction to be made between postmodernity as a socio-political concept and postmodernism as a cultural concept. All the instincts of postmodernists are against such a differentiation of spheres. For postmodernists, it is no longer useful to distinguish subsystems within the social world – culture, society, politics, economy are all collapsed together.
This does not lead, however, to an undifferentiated premodern social situation. The plurality of society is not denied (far from it – cf. Lyotard), but the modern notion that there was some controlling or directing power (economy, tradition, politics) is denied: “There is simply a more or less random, directionless flux across all sectors of society. The boundaries between them are dissolved, leading however not to neo-primitivist wholeness but to a post-modern condition of fragmentation.” The privileged site, if there is one, is cultural, and postmodernism is, by some definitions at least, primarily a reaction to cultural modernism.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…