An SBL paper attempts to apply post-colonial theory to the “Deuteronomistic” view of women as de-humanized sexualized temptresses. He of course places Deuteronomistic history late, and thus itself “post-colonial,” and he conveniently claims that any contrary evidence in Deuteronomy (eg, ch. 21).
Most problematic: What does he gain with his use of the theory? Not much. He already knows what view of women Deuteronomy will have before he looks at the text. Theory tells him. Who needs to do research?
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
Notes on Anosmia
One morning several years ago, as my wife, Wendy, and I were having breakfast together, I had…
