Some reflections on a lecture by Mitch Stokes, a new fellow at NSA, concerning the differences between philosophy and theology.
Ultimately, I don’t believe there is any room for an absolute distinction of theology and philosophy. This is what Stokes said: He defined both theology and “philosophy broadly construed” in Framean terms as “the application of Scripture to all of life.” I agree with that, and would be happy to see philosophy departments admit defeat and close down. I don’t have any desire to defend modern disciplinary boundaries.
In practice there is at least a relative difference between the two. How to characterize that? Mitch offered a definition of “philosophy narrowly construed” as well, suggesting, among other things, that theology tends to be more directly derived from special revelation than philosophy.
But here are some alternative characterizations that occurred to me:
1) It seems preferable to describe the differences in diachronic, historical terms, rather than in synchronic, spatialized terms. That is, theology and philosophy differ as two traditions of intellectual inquiry. Attempting to draw boundary lines, whether in terms of subject matter, method, or purpose, seems to lead to insoluable difficulties.
2) The difference is a choice of interlocutors. The theologian and Christian philosopher are both attempting to articulate what Scripture says, but they have chosen to do that with a different set of conversation partners. Theologians decide they want to spend time in the company of Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, Luther, Barth, while philosophers (for inexplicable reasons) prefer the company of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Kant, Wittgenstein.
3) The difference is a choice of idiom or literary genre. Doing philosophy is like learning a new language, or like learning to write sonnets.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
