At The Atlantic, Peter Beinart explains why Obama doesn’t think that terrorism is a threat to our way of life: “Unlike Rubio, he considers violent jihadism a small, toxic strain within Islamic civilization, not a civilization itself. And unlike Bush, he doesn’t consider it a serious ideological competitor. In the 1930s, when fascism and communism were at their ideological height, many believed they could produce higher living standards for ordinary people than democratic capitalist societies that were prone to devastating cycles of boom and bust. No one believes that about ‘radical Islam’ today.”
Obama also thinks that terrorism is getting weaker. He said in his address on Sunday that terrorists are diminished; they’ve been reduced to “less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society.” Beinart glosses: “the Islamic State probably can’t do anything to America that we Americans aren’t doing to ourselves all the time, and now largely take for granted.”
Rather than massive retaliation, Obama thinks that the US and Europe mainly have to avoid missteps. No more occupations, for example, which arguably drive terrorism more than ideology, and no more isolation and ostracism of American Muslims: “he thinks that few American Muslims will embrace it unless the United States makes them feel like enemies in their own country.” In the abstract, this is a reasonable outlook. It has the virtue of taking the long view: Western values will win out over time, Obama thinks. Hold the course, and give it time.
Reasonable, but unconvincing. Obama’s track record in the Middle East hardly inspires confidence. He assumes that liberalism as it now stands has the resiliency to stand up over the long haul. That is questionable. But there’s a deeper problem. Beinart calls Obama a “Fukuyamian” who is convinced of liberalism’s inevitable, faux-Hegelian triumph. That’s a naive view of history’s shape. The world isn’t a smooth unfolding of the Idea of absolute spirit or of freedom. It changes rapidly, jarringly, unexpectedly, defying the most dispassionate calculations. Fukuyamians are are liable to be overtaken by reality.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…