Not Quite the End of Sacrifice

Christianity brought the “end of sacrifice,” the replacement of the bloody animal sacrifices of paganism and Judaism with the sacrificial feast of the Eucharist.

But not quite the end, or at least not quite everywhere. In a 1903 article, Fred Conybeare explored the “survival of animal sacrifices inside the Christian church.” The Armenian church is a case in point. When King Irdat was converted by the preaching of Gregory the Illuminator, himself the scion of the “leading pagan priestly family” that had made chief pagan shrine part of the family estate, Gregory gave advice regarding the distribution of sacrificial perquisites to Christian priests: “Your portions of the offerings shall be the hide and right-hand parts of the spine, the limb and fat, and the tail and heart and lobe of lungs, and the tripe with the lard; of the ribs and shank-bones a part, the tongue and the right ear, and the right eye and all the secret parts.”

This custom long outlasted the age of Gregory, which was the age of Diocletian.

In the late 12th century, the Armenian Patriarch Nerses Shnorhali defended animal sacrifices against the criticisms of Byzantine theologians. He cites Gregory as authority: “He enjoined the people to substitute for the oblations which they had been wont to offer to filthy idols, oblations of animals sacrificed to the only God; with these oblations was to be mingled salt duly blessed, and such offerings were to be made on the Pascha of the Resurrection, on every Dominical Feast, on the Feasts of illustrious Saints, and lastly, in commemoration of those who have died in Christ, as almsgivings to be eaten in their name by the hungry.”

Unsurprisingly, at the same time Armenian priests continued to form a priestly caste: “the common village priests continued for centuries to be taken from the old priestly families; indeed, it is doubtful whether the idea of a man’s taking holy orders, not because his father had them before him, but because he has a serious call, has even yet established itself in the far East, so firmly engrained in the popular mind is the idea of priestly families.”

In Armenia at least, the process of weaning culture away from “flesh” – animal sacrifices, genealogical qualifications for priests – was centuries-long.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…