Freeman again: He claims that Constantine employed the image of the sun, used in both Christianity and paganism, to maintain “his neutral position between opposing faiths.”
In part, his interpretation is based on HA Drake. But the neutrality that Drake talks about is a neutrality in “public space” that enabled the development of “a stable coalition of both Christians and non-Christians in support of this program of ‘peaceful co-existence,’” a coalition that Drake says was more successful “than has generally been recognized” (this is a section of Constantine and the Bishops quoted by Freeman).
Constantine’s intention to create a cooperative public space implied nothing about his own personal neutrality between Christianity and paganism. It doesn’t even mean that public policy was neutral between paganism and Christianity. If you had the chance to ask any informed pagan of the 320s if Constantine was religiously “neutral,” the answer (following imprecations and curses) would not have been affirmative.
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…