An infallible Scripture needs an infallible interpreter. So Catholics have argued, at least since the Reformation.
Luther, of course, disagreed: “They must admit that there are many among us, godly Christians, who have the truth faith, spirit, understanding, word and mind of Christ, and why then should one reject their word and understanding and follow the pope who has neither faith nor spirit? . . . Since we are all priests and all have one faith, one gospel and one sacrament, why then should we not have the authority to test and determine what is right or not right in the faith?”
Significantly, Luther offers a more communal/corporate view of the interpretation of Scripture (he complained frequently about lodging interpretive decisions in “one man”). He also, obviously and famously, denies that that there’s a single final interpretation of Scripture – neither in Pope or council.
Protestants have not always grasped the flip side of this. If there is no infallible interpreter of Scripture, then we are left with a host of fallible interpreters and interpretations. Protestants trust that the Spirit is the Spirit of illumination, who leads into truth. But that doesn’t nullify the fact that for Luther and for all Protestants there is no single place where the hermeneutical buck stops. Protestantism affirms a certain and infallible Bible, but acknowledges that every interpretation of that Bible is subject to revision in the light of further interpretation. Protestantism requires Christians to live with a degree of uncertainty. In this, as in other ways, the Reformation is a child of the Renaissance.
Protestantism, we might say, is all about dissemination.
Is this a deep root of postmodernism? Is this one of the reasons why some Protestants have resonated to some postmodern themes? Is this a reason why we’re seeing Protestants converting to Catholicism?
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
