In The Historical Austen , William Galperin notes that Austen understood that certain kinds of realistic art or aesthetics could naturalize and “realize” what is really only an ideological construct. And he notes the somewhat surprising political ramifications of such aesthetic theories. He points to the theory of the picturesque, which Austen satirizes in a number of works ( Northanger Abbey , for instance):
The picturesque “was an aesthetic where the ‘natural’ was restricted to a number of representational possibilities, none of which was comprehensive or faithful necessarily to what was ‘out there.’ To theorists of the picturesque . . . it was fine, indeed imperative, to conceive the natural as rough, ungoverned, and variegated so long as the scene was not also ugly or dull or fraught with any untoward surprises. In addition the particular animus of picturesque theory to the landscape improvements of such English ‘gardeners’ as Lancelot ‘Capability’ Brown and Humphrey Repton (a rebate that figures prominently in Mansfield Park) was unabashedly ideological in equating a certain kind of landscape gardening – one that was especially self-conscious in exposing the imprint of the human upon nature – with the leveling initiatives in France and at home. In a remarkable reconfiguration of political affiliations and identities, proponents of the picturesque were disposed to league wealthy individuals, who frequently initiated such improvements, with the ‘revolutionary’ masses in an effort to reclaim a middle (and higher moral) ground for the social order, at once conservative and middle class, in whose interests they were writing.”
Galperin cites Ann Bermingham, who in her Landscape and Ideology suggests that while picturesque theory appealed to the wealthy classes of landowners, “at a deeper level the picturesque endorsed the results of agricultural industrialization” that was undermining the “paternalistic, quasi-feudal system of reciprocal rights and duties” that the picturesque, because of its “emphasis on age” was also promoting.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…