Does God do all He does to glorify Himself, or for the sake of His creatures? Neither alternative satisfies. If the former, He seems a cosmic narcissist; if the latter, a cosmic therapist.
According to Jenson ( America’s Theologian: A Recommendation of Jonathan Edwards 
He begins from the premise that God’s attributes are “a sufficiency to certain acts and effects.” From that he concludes that in valuing Himself and His attributes, He supremely values his acts and effects. Because God is a communicative Being, His acts are communications and this means that they effect knowledge. God cannot supremely value His own acts without valuing others’ knowledge of them, which is knowledge of God. God is good, and knowing Him is blessedness, and so “in supremely valuing himself, God supremely values our blessedness.”
Jenson notes that the solvent for dissolving the dilemma is a Trinitarian one.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
