Feeling poetic

I’m no poet, but sometimes I feel poetic. What’s that feel like? It feels like, “I wish I were a poet so I translate that to language.”

But there are a couple of other things going on too. One is a desire for explanation. When the spring breeze comes through the window of my library and billows the curtains, or I see the breath of God make the trees outside dance, I wonder about wind. I think briefly about oxygen, CO2, water vapor, nitrogen, whatever; but when I reach for an explanation I don’t reach for science. I wish I were a poet. I feel poetic.

Poetry as a mode of explanation: That’s an ancient and perhaps medieval instinct. Lucretius chose poetry as the vehicle for exploring the nature of things because it sweetened the hard doctrines of his Epicurean atomism. But he also thought poetry was a mode of explanation.

Why? I suspect this is related to the second thing that’s going on when I feel poetic: It’s a desire to render something that eludes my grasp. In some ways, this second feature defies the first. How can poetic inspiration be both a desire for explanation and a desire to describe what one cannot (perhaps ever) explain? I don’t think the two motives are contradictory; they only seem so because “explanation” has been monopolized by science. Someone has recently written a book advocating an “epistemology of ignorance.” That’s the epistemology of poetry.

This has a final corollary. If poetry aims at explanation of the unexplainable, then it drifts, in the nature of the case, from the poet. That is, the poet can’t finally and fully say what he’s about. I recently tried to write a little poem after an evening walk through a park. Only after working on it did I realize that there was a theme – an autumnal/winter theme of bare branches, sunset, frozen pond. I didn’t set out to write an autumnal poem. I tried to capture what was there, and it turned out autumnally.

And this corollary has a corollary: Poetry exceeds the poet because the world does. We try to render the world in words, but the words always capture more than we realize because there is meaning embedded out there, in the things we’re trying to translate into verse. I was moved by the scene in the park, but I didn’t quite know why. I still don’t entirely, but I’ve got a better idea now than before I attempted the poem. The poem didn’t record a prior experience; it recorded the world and revealed the experience in the process.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…