Elie Wiesel, for some inscrutable reason, believes that Mitt Romney owes America and the world an explanation of the posthumous baptism of Jews carried out by some elements of the Mormon church:
“How come that he hasn’t spoken up after all? It’s not, I’m sure he’s not involved in that. But nevertheless, the moment he heard about this, he should have spoken up, because he is running for the presidency of the United States, which means it’s too serious of an issue for him not to speak up,” he added.
Issuing a statement on an obscure Mormon religious practice—-one with which the candidate has no established connection whatsoever—-would be unnecessary and unhelpful. Unless Romney is running to defend and vindicate every detail of LDS faith and practice (including its possibly illegitimate excesses) there’s just no reason for him to take this up.
That would all change, though, if Romney began invoking the doctrine of posthumous baptism on the stump. This is exactly what has happened with another little-known aspect of LDS belief—-the view that U.S. Constitution is actually divine . Most of this Mormon belief appears to me to be a wholly mainstream and orthodox view that God in his providence sustains all history and reality, including the founding of our nation. But this belief also appears to go much further. As LDS President Ezra Taft Benson wrote in 1988 :
I reverence the Constitution of the United States as a sacred document. To me its words are akin to the revelations of God, for God has placed His stamp of approval upon it.
This, I think, is a step too far in civic religion. As Politico’s Reid Epstein reported (apparently not grasping the doctrinal significance of the statement), earlier this week in Arizona, Romney invoked this Mormon belief, saying of the Constitution and Declaration “They’re either inspired by God or written by brilliant people or perhaps a combination of both.”
To ask what he means by this is a very fair question indeed. Many of the commenters in James Rogers’ article on Romney’s statement have claimed that by “divine inspiration” Mormons mean something very different from what Christians mean. Fair enough. But what, exactly, does presidential candidate Mitt Romney mean when he uses such theologically freighted language during campaign events?
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
