In the final panel discussion at the LA Theological Conference, Alan Torrance offered this arresting interpretation of Peter’s confession in Matthew 16: Peter rightly confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, and Jesus responds by telling him “flesh and blood did not reveal this to you but My Father” and then changes Peter’s name. Peter’s identity is changed in his recognition of Jesus’ identity. But when Jesus tells the disciples that He goes to Jerusalem to die, Peter rebukes him. A Messiah who dies in Jerusalem doesn’t fit Peter’s preconceptions of Messianic action or behavior.
Peter is, Torrance said, a type of the Procrustean theology who tries to fit the Messiah into a prior system, metaphysical, religious, or other. This reverses the direction of theological method: Jesus is the standard, and what we mean by “Messiah” or “Savior” or “king” or “priest” is found in Jesus. He’s reference point and measure of everything; he is measured by none, but measures all.
When Peter rebukes Jesus, Jesus turns to rebuke Peter: “Get behind me Satan.” Any theology that attempts to determine Jesus rather than letting Jesus determine it, is demonic.
The discussion immediately went to Marcionism:
Is Jesus determined by the “constraints” of Israel’s prior institutions and categories? I’ve had similar questions about Barth’s Christocentrism, but I think the charge can be rebutted. If the institutions of Israel are God’s own prefigurations of Christ, if Christ is, as Reformed theologians have often insisted, Himself the center of those institutions (the Rock that followed Israel, the glory in the temple), then saying that Jesus conforms to the institutions of Israel is simply to say that He is self-consistent.
With that qualification, I think that Torrance is exactly right. Whatever use we make of other resources (and all things are ours), any theology that does not take God’s self-revelation in Jesus and His Word as the measure of everything it asserts about everything, any theology that attempts to fit Jesus and His Word into an alien framework, earns Jesus’ stinging rebuke: “Get behind me Satan.”
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…