Cross and Union

In his Theology of the New Testament (Zondervan, 2005), Frank Thielman responds to the claim that justification is secondary to participation with Christ in Paul’s theology. Thielman does not agree, but he does say that it is true that “Paul’s references to the death of Christ more often support his notion of participation in Christ’s death than they support explanations of God’s justification of the sinner.”

If true (and I take Thielman’s word for it), this would seem to have important implications for our understanding of the effect of the cross. Christ’s death is more often seen as the ground for our participation in Christ’s death (and resurrection) than as the ground for God’s judicial verdict (though Paul says both). That may link up with Ephesians 2, which shows that the cross is the means for breaking down the dividing wall between Jew and Greek. Through His death, Jesus burst the boundaries between us and God, and made it possible for us to share in the life of Jesus, which is the life of God.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Moral Certitude and the Iran War

Steven A. Long

The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…

The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books

Mark Bauerlein

The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…

Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War

R. R. Reno

What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…