Jerome Neyrey summarizes the effect of Jesus’ instruction to pray, give alms, and fast “in private” in terms of ancient honor systems: “In essence, the disciples must separate themselves from ‘their’ synagogues; they may not join other observant Judeans in publicly practicing almsgiving, prayer, and fasting. But inasmuch as these symbolic actions create and reinforce group identity and loyalty, refusal to join one’s neighbors would be interpreted as rejection of group identity, loyalty, and the code of gender expectations. The disciple’s spatial and social separation flaunts public opinion (in itself a shameful act) and risks incurring hostility and shame for not fulfilling those expectations. As a result, he will be looked upon with suspicion and hostility; his reputation will be in jeopardy; and honor will be lost for nonparticipation . . . . Jesus’ male disciples, then, will lose face before their neighbors as well as consequent opportunities for honorable interaction such as public feasts, marriages, and the like.”
Undercover in Canada’s Lawless Abortion Industry
On November 27, 2023, thirty-six-year-old Alissa Golob walked through the doors of the Cabbagetown Women’s Clinic in…
The Return of Blasphemy Laws?
Over my many years in the U.S., I have resisted the temptation to buy into the catastrophism…
The Fourth Watch
The following is an excerpt from the first edition of The Fourth Watch, a newsletter about Catholicism from First…