Jerome Neyrey summarizes the effect of Jesus’ instruction to pray, give alms, and fast “in private” in terms of ancient honor systems: “In essence, the disciples must separate themselves from ‘their’ synagogues; they may not join other observant Judeans in publicly practicing almsgiving, prayer, and fasting. But inasmuch as these symbolic actions create and reinforce group identity and loyalty, refusal to join one’s neighbors would be interpreted as rejection of group identity, loyalty, and the code of gender expectations. The disciple’s spatial and social separation flaunts public opinion (in itself a shameful act) and risks incurring hostility and shame for not fulfilling those expectations. As a result, he will be looked upon with suspicion and hostility; his reputation will be in jeopardy; and honor will be lost for nonparticipation . . . . Jesus’ male disciples, then, will lose face before their neighbors as well as consequent opportunities for honorable interaction such as public feasts, marriages, and the like.”
The Enduring Legacy of the Spanish Mystics
Last autumn, I spent a few days at my family’s coastal country house in northwestern Spain. The…
The trouble with blogging …
The trouble with blogging, RJN, is narrative structure. Or maybe voice. Or maybe diction. Or maybe syntax.…
The Bible Throughout the Ages
The latest installment of an ongoing interview series with contributing editor Mark Bauerlein. Bruce Gordon joins in…