Jerome Neyrey summarizes the effect of Jesus’ instruction to pray, give alms, and fast “in private” in terms of ancient honor systems: “In essence, the disciples must separate themselves from ‘their’ synagogues; they may not join other observant Judeans in publicly practicing almsgiving, prayer, and fasting. But inasmuch as these symbolic actions create and reinforce group identity and loyalty, refusal to join one’s neighbors would be interpreted as rejection of group identity, loyalty, and the code of gender expectations. The disciple’s spatial and social separation flaunts public opinion (in itself a shameful act) and risks incurring hostility and shame for not fulfilling those expectations. As a result, he will be looked upon with suspicion and hostility; his reputation will be in jeopardy; and honor will be lost for nonparticipation . . . . Jesus’ male disciples, then, will lose face before their neighbors as well as consequent opportunities for honorable interaction such as public feasts, marriages, and the like.”
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…