Jerome Neyrey summarizes the effect of Jesus’ instruction to pray, give alms, and fast “in private” in terms of ancient honor systems: “In essence, the disciples must separate themselves from ‘their’ synagogues; they may not join other observant Judeans in publicly practicing almsgiving, prayer, and fasting. But inasmuch as these symbolic actions create and reinforce group identity and loyalty, refusal to join one’s neighbors would be interpreted as rejection of group identity, loyalty, and the code of gender expectations. The disciple’s spatial and social separation flaunts public opinion (in itself a shameful act) and risks incurring hostility and shame for not fulfilling those expectations. As a result, he will be looked upon with suspicion and hostility; his reputation will be in jeopardy; and honor will be lost for nonparticipation . . . . Jesus’ male disciples, then, will lose face before their neighbors as well as consequent opportunities for honorable interaction such as public feasts, marriages, and the like.”
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…