Burning flesh

FCN Hicks writes in his 1946 book on sacrifice that the burning of an animal on the altar was not destructive but transforming: “The offering is not destroyed but transformed, sublimated, etherealised, so that it can ascend in smoke to the heaven above, to the dwelling-place of God.” He cites Elijah’s sacrifice on Carmel to make the point that the burning was “God’s acceptance of that which is offered. In accepting, he transforms it into a condition in which it can enter into His life.”

He also states matter-of-factly that “To atone is kipper , to cover,” citing Psalm 73:38 and 79:9. He adds that sin offends the holy God who demands righteousness, and that the sinner himself needs to be covered, cleansed, forgiven. Throughout his discussion of atonement, though, he reverts to the basic notion of “covering.”

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Moral Certitude and the Iran War

Steven A. Long

The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…

The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books

Mark Bauerlein

The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…

Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War

R. R. Reno

What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…