A sketch of a Jensonian critique of historical criticism of Scripture:
The Bible must be understood in its historical context. In practice, this means that the Bible’s historical claims are relativized to the discoveries of ancient historical investigation, archaeology, etc. If the bricks and pottery shards say that Jericho didn’t exist when Hebrews entered the land, then the claims of the book of Joshua are historically inaccurate.
Joshua is then re-read as a mythically enhanced account of what actually happened.
What happened was the slow and peaceful migration of scattered Semitic tribes into Palestine; what Israel told was a story of conquest. Joshua isn’t history; it instead gives a theological message about God giving the land. The theological message is true, even if the Bible doesn’t tell of actual events.
That runs into Jenson’s claim that the God of Israel is a God identified with and by historical events. “I am Yahweh who brought you out of Egypt” – but that event may not really have happened, certainly not as Exodus records. “Remember what the Lord did to Pharaoh and to all Egypt” – but what did He do? On critical grounds, we can’t be sure. “The Lord gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give to their fathers” – but how did He give it?
Historical critics can still say that God acts in history, but they can’t identify what exactly He has done in history. Because they cannot identify the acts of God, they cannot (on Jensonian grounds) identify God at all. They cannot pick out the God who chose Abraham and delivered Israel because that God is capable of being picked out of the lineup of gods and pretenders by the things He does.
And if they don’t pick out God by what He has done in history – because they can’t say what He has done – they don’t really the God of the Bible, identified by what He has done in history.
In pursuing a historical analysis of Scripture, criticism loses the genius of Scripture, which is precisely the revelation of a God identified by and with election, exodus, conquest, exile, and return.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
