“Presence” has been subjected to withering attacks for decades, but Antonio Lopez ( Gift and the Unity of Being , 23-8) wants to rescue it. In his description, though, presence is virtually the opposite of what postmodernism claims it is.
To say that “being is presence” implies several things. First, it means that existence is irreducible to either the presenter or the one to whom it is presented. It is, in short, a way of speaking difference . Further, if being is present, it means that “it addresses the one who whom it comes. The coming into being of concrete singulars aims at man’s welcoming of the irreducible, inexhaustible alterity of the singular gift.”
Being as presence also means belonging: “To be present to someone is to be given to someone, and in a certain sense to belong to that person,” and this means that “gift, being as presence, is not a self-enclosed reality. It is always already with other beings.”
In short, the problem is not with presence, but with a particular thin and brittle conception of presence.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
