“Presence” has been subjected to withering attacks for decades, but Antonio Lopez ( Gift and the Unity of Being , 23-8) wants to rescue it. In his description, though, presence is virtually the opposite of what postmodernism claims it is.
To say that “being is presence” implies several things. First, it means that existence is irreducible to either the presenter or the one to whom it is presented. It is, in short, a way of speaking difference . Further, if being is present, it means that “it addresses the one who whom it comes. The coming into being of concrete singulars aims at man’s welcoming of the irreducible, inexhaustible alterity of the singular gift.”
Being as presence also means belonging: “To be present to someone is to be given to someone, and in a certain sense to belong to that person,” and this means that “gift, being as presence, is not a self-enclosed reality. It is always already with other beings.”
In short, the problem is not with presence, but with a particular thin and brittle conception of presence.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
