It would seem that non-Trinitarian ontologies cannot secure a notion of beauty, and this seems to be the case because of the tragic ontologies that dominate non-Christian thought.
1) Beauty is fittingness, a matter of harmonics. Thus, beauty requires that there be plurality. Need at least two for things to “fit” and “be fitting.”
2) Non-Christian ontologies either see difference as a contamination of an original unity (Derrida’s Plato), and hence ugly; or see difference as violent and irresolvable, in which case too beauty is lost. Whereas Trinitarian theology affirms that difference is primal, but that it is harmonized difference.
3) In Platonizing systems of thought, the One is beauty. But this is still problematic, and not just because one cannot harmonize with itself. It is problematic also because either a) the viewer of the beauty is absorbed into the One, leaving no one to experience the beauty or b) the viewer/experiencer of beauty is NOT absorbed, which means he remains a contaminating supplement. We are left with a beauty that no one can appreciate, or a beauty tarnished by the presence of the “other” alongside the one.
4) The best such Platonizing systems can offer is a longing for beauty that is never realized. Whereas in Christianity, the believer is caught up in the harmonics of Trinitarian beauty.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
How the State Failed Noelia Castillo
On March 26, Noelia Castillo, a twenty-five-year-old Spanish woman, was killed by her doctors at her own…
The Mind’s Profane and Sacred Loves
The teachers you have make all the difference in your life. That they happened to come into…
