Brian Leftow ends his 1995 Modern Schoolman article with this:
“Anselm’s appeal to fittingness, then, might serve to undermine the claim the value of efficiency has on God’s choices. For if beauty can trump efficiency, it could be a rational virtue for a perfectly wise being to act inefficiently, if by doing so He created sufficient beauty . . . . There seems no reason at all that another sort of beauty could not trump elegance. If so, elegance need not always be a rational virtue for a perfectly wise agent: it could be a rational virtue, in fact, to favor another sort of beauty over elegance.
“Thus it could be rational for God to choose a plan of salvation whose peculiar beauty attracts Him — whether or not some other plan might realize a greater amount of some other sort of value, or other sort of beauty . . . . Anselm’s ‘fittingness’ arguments turn out to have a surprising importance. If it is rational for God to value beauty, it is rational for Him to seek an elegant plan of salvation — one which procures many goods at a single stroke. Anselm makes a case that He has done so. But it is also rational for God to opt for a salvation-plan whose peculiar beauties appeal to Him.”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Lift My Chin, Lord
Lift my chin, Lord,Say to me,“You are not whoYou feared to be,Not Hecate, quite,With howling sound,Torch held…
Letters
Two delightful essays in the March issue, by Nikolas Prassas (“Large Language Poetry,” March 2025) and Gary…
Spring Twilight After Penance
Let’s say you’ve just comeFrom confession. Late sunPours through the budding treesThat mark the brown creek washing Itself…
