There is a terrible mental illness called Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), aka “amputee wannabe” because the sufferer becomes obsessed with having healthy limbs cut off. I have written before that some are actually arguing that a proper treatment for the disorder would be to cut off the healthy limb as requested. And now, an article in Neuroethics, urges this very course. From the article by Christopher James Ryan, Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, Australia:
When faced with a patient requesting the amputation of a healthy limb, clinicians should make a careful diagnostic assessment. If the patient is found to have body integrity identity disorder, amputation of the healthy limb may be appropriate after a trial of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and after careful consideration of the risks, benefits and unknowns of all possible treatment alternatives. The results of treatment trials should be published to allow growth in our knowledge of the condition.
Sufferers of BIID might be relieved to know that members of the medical profession will take their concerns seriously and that, after careful deliberation, elective amputation of their troubling limb is a real possibility.
This too is an aspect of the culture of death and nihilism. And as is becoming increasingly common in these matters, doctors who have a moral problem, Dr. Ryan suggests, can opt out but must be complicit in the deed by finding a doctor willing to do the sawing:
As is the case in termination of pregnancy, dissenting doctors should be under no obligation to proceed with an amputation in these circumstances, but are under an obligation to refer the patient to another doctor whom they believe might proceed with the amputation if all the caveats are met
So, this is what we are becoming. In the name of autonomy, in the face of obsession and profound mental illness, learned professionals are arguing very seriously that physicians should be allowed to cut off healthy limbs. But such a course would not only harm the individual—harm properly understood—but it would be devastating blow to society, reflecting a culture that would willingly abandon the most disturbed among us to their psychoses and emotional demons. But expect me to be called uncompassionate for saying so.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
