Watching Santorum

So my two year old daughter and I watched most of a Santorum town hall event from New Hampshire (start them early I say.) 

1.  He actually talks to people.  I’m sure he falls back on some pat phrases, but there is a sense that he is actually talking to his questioner.

2.  He doesn’t just preach to the converted.  This isn’t Gingrich talking about how Obama is immensely stupid and how he will reveal it to America and the world in a three hour debate. This isn’t Herman Cain doing a softball interview about 9-9-9 and how his peace through strength clichés are more important than actually knowing anything about anything.  Santorum actually engaged people who (quite moralistically) disagreed with him on the issues.  I don’t think he is especially persuasive, but he does actually try to persuade.

3.  He is good at talking about entitlement and energy policy.  Once again, not great, but America would benefit more from listening to him than from Gingrich’s Medicare nonsense, Mitt Romney’s canned talking points (though Romney has a pretty good plan entitlement plan but chooses not to talk much about it) or Perry talking about making Congress part time.  If we can get American listening to Santorum talking about that stuff, we might make it easier for some later politician to talk about and implement entitlement reforms.

4.  Towards the end of the event, a lady told Santorum that she hoped he respected her pro-choice (on abortion) principles.  Now, maybe I missed something, but I never got the impression that Santorum did anything but articulate his own pro-life principles and argue that abortion policy should be settled by democratic deliberation.  My sense was that she meant that tolerating his continued existence in society while he held his opinions constituted respect on her part, and his silent acquiescence in a radical pro-choice policy regime ought to constitute respect on his part.  I thought Santorum handled that question pretty well.

Dear Reader,

Can I be direct with you?

War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.

First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.

But we can’t do it without readers like you.

Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.


Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.

Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.

GIVE NOW

If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.

Next
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

The Church in the Age of Therapy

Matthew Loftus

In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…

Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot

Anna Farrow

On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…

The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen

Mike Aquilina

Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…