Lots of folks are talking about the current Vanity Fair story on the Creation Museum in KY. I’ll let someone else start a chat about the story in particular or the museum (follow the Scott Lamb link below for one such discussion); I wish to deal with something more general and foundational.
Check out this quotation from the Vanity Fair story (heads up: if you follow the link, remember the nature of VF’s photography):
“This place doesn’t just take on evolution—it squares off with geology, anthropology, paleontology, history, chemistry, astronomy, zoology, biology, and good taste. It directly and boldly contradicts most -onomies and all -ologies, including most theology.”
(h-tip: Scott Lamb , who notes that the VF story seems surprised by this wide-ranging engagement on the part of the museum.)
Now compare that with this quotation from Abraham Kuyper:
“In the total expanse of human life there is not a single square inch of which the Christ, who alone is sovereign, does not declare, “That is mine.”
These two statements distill the essential difference between a secularist worldview and a Christian one.
A Christian worldview is relentlessly unified, viewing knowledge itself as pointing to an ultimate unity. Christ is Lord over all (Acts 10:36 & Phil. 2:10-12). He is reconciling all things (2 Cor. 5:19). We are called to take captive every thought to Christ (2 Cor. 10:5). Indeed, the hermeneutical key to the entire universe is God’s self-revelation of Himself.
A secularist worldview is hopelessly fractured. Each academic discipline is a silo. Each perspective on the world, no matter how contradictory, is equally valid; there are no “priorities.” Each opinion is entitled to a seat at the table of ideas (except, of course, for any opinion that dares to point out the logical inconsistencies of the other opinions). There can be no meaningful interpretive key for knowledge because there is only disintegration and brokenness among the various stakeholders.
Once we understand these radical differences, we can see how high the stakes of the conversation really are, and how far-reaching, whether in cultural issues or theological disputes.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
