A few years ago, the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly passed a non-binding (as are all UN pronouncements) resolution urging all member nations to outlaw all human cloning. But now, UN bureaucrats ignore this approach—the only one that would truly prevent human cloning—in favor of a ban on reproductive cloning only. From the story in Reuters:
The world should quickly ban cloning of humans and only allow exceptions for strictly controlled research to help treat diseases such as diabetes or Alzheimer’s, a U.N. study said on Sunday. Without a ban, experts at the U.N. University’s Institute of Advanced Studies said that governments would have to prepare legal measures to protect clones from “potential abuse, prejudice and discrimination”.
“A legally-binding global ban on work to create a human clone, coupled with freedom for nations to permit strictly controlled therapeutic research, has the greatest political viability of options available,” the study said.
Of course, that would open the gate and invite the fox into the hen house—which is precisely the point, I think. Right now, human cloning has not really been done. To perfect the technology, will require billions of dollars, tens of thousands of human eggs, currently in very short supply, and perhaps years of effort. That can only go forward vigorously if cloning for biomedical research is given society’s imprimatur—which is what legalization per the UN “study” recommendation would provide. Then, once the technology was “safe,” we would then hear calls to proceed to permit reproductive cloning for the infertile, gay couples, and etc. Indeed, we are already hearing those calls! (See, here, here, and here, as just a few examples.)
Legalizing human SCNT for any purpose is to legalize human cloning. Period. To do a “partial ban,” which is really legalization since SCNT is the act of cloning, is utter subterfuge. The only way to prevent the horrors foreseen by the “study” is to follow the recommendations of the General Assembly.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…