James Jordan points to structural links between the death of the innocents at hands of Herod (Matt 2) death of innocent Jesus at hands of Romans (Matt 27). While Jesus escapes the first slaughter by fleeing to Egypt, he enters the “Egypt” of Jerusalem/Judea to suffer the slaughter.
There is an inversion of the logic of Passover at work here. The original logic was that the Egyptians who killed the firstborn of Israel would themselves lose their firstborn. In Matthew, “Pharaoh” Herod slaughters infants but does not lose his firstborn. Instead, Jesus, the firstborn of the Father, is killed in a greater Passover. Herod strikes out at the infant King, and instead of receiving retaliation, another king, Pilate, gets a second change to strike, and succeeds.
Herod strikes on one cheek; Jesus turns His cheek so Pilate can strike the other.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Restoring Man at Notre Dame
It is fascinating to be an outsider on the inside of an institution going through times of…
Deliver Us from Evil
In a recent New York Times article entitled “Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery…
Natural Law Needs Revelation
Natural law theory teaches that God embedded a teleological moral order in the world, such that things…
