James Jordan points to structural links between the death of the innocents at hands of Herod (Matt 2) death of innocent Jesus at hands of Romans (Matt 27). While Jesus escapes the first slaughter by fleeing to Egypt, he enters the “Egypt” of Jerusalem/Judea to suffer the slaughter.
There is an inversion of the logic of Passover at work here. The original logic was that the Egyptians who killed the firstborn of Israel would themselves lose their firstborn. In Matthew, “Pharaoh” Herod slaughters infants but does not lose his firstborn. Instead, Jesus, the firstborn of the Father, is killed in a greater Passover. Herod strikes out at the infant King, and instead of receiving retaliation, another king, Pilate, gets a second change to strike, and succeeds.
Herod strikes on one cheek; Jesus turns His cheek so Pilate can strike the other.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Moral Certitude and the Iran War
The current military engagement with Iran calls renewed attention to just war theory in the Catholic tradition.…
The Slow Death of England: New and Notable Books
The fate of England is much in the news as popular resistance to mass immigration grows, limits…
Ethics of Rhetoric in Times of War
What we say matters. And the way we say it matters. This is especially true in times…
