I really like the guy but the skeptical comments regarding Santorum by Bryan, Sara, Stephen P, and Peter Lawler deserve attention. Take the whole women in combat thing. His point about group dynamics isn’t crazy, but he is just off. He just isn’t quick enough or disciplined enough to deflect these kinds of questions or make his point in an unalienating way. I don’t think the women in combat thing hurts him, but it is a warning. If Santorum is somehow the Republican nominee, he is going to get suckered into these kinds of culture war fights every couple of weeks. And this is Santorum being good. He isn’t that bright, he isn’t that articulate, and he can’t be fixed.
And yet . . . He was the only Republican who was able to make a compelling case against Romneycare TO A REPUBLICAN AUDIENCE. The other non-Romney Republican presidential candidates either couldn’t or wouldn’t make a case against Romneycare that could win over the right-of-center voters that populate Republican primaries and caucuses. Think about how much incompetence that involves. I saw this candidate forum where Bachmann said she thought the Massachusetts state-level health insurance purchase mandate violated the Constitution. When Robert George asked her what part of the Constitution the mandate violated, she said she didn’t know.
Among Santorum’s virtues are these: He is against government-run medicine. He cared enough about the issue to study and construct an in depth argument about the many similarities between Romneycare and Obamacare like guaranteed issue, community rating, government-imposed coverage mandates and of course the insurance purchase mandate. Romney still hasn’t figured a defense against Santorum’s critique that will work with right-leaning voters. Maybe there isn’t one.
And Santorum still isn’t that bright. He just has beliefs and did the work. The biggest story here is the cynicism and/or ignorance-by-choice of the rest of the Republican field.
Dear Reader,
Can I be direct with you?
War abroad. Socialists on the rise. AI upending human life. Endless uproar online. The modern attention economy doesn’t want readers — it wants users enslaved to the tyranny of the present.
First Things is the antidote: literary excellence, timeless truths, and a fixed point of reference in a culture that has lost its bearings.
But we can’t do it without readers like you.
Our goal: Raise $150,000 by November 1 to sustain First Things in the year ahead.
Your gift anchors readers in the permanent things.
Make your Fall Campaign gift now using the button below.
If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Giovanni Del Piero, Director of the Editor’s Circle, at gdelpiero@firstthings.com or 212-627-1985.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
The Church in the Age of Therapy
In 1966, Philip Rieff wrote in The Triumph of the Therapeutic that “Religious man was born to…
Canada’s Deadliest Blind Spot
On September 20, the Daily Mail ran a story with the provocative headline, “Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother…
The Faithful Joy of Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen
Dolly Parton and Fulton Sheen seem to have had little in common. She favored rhinestones; he wore…
